<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Architect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theamericanheathen.com/2012/10/14/the-architect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theamericanheathen.com/2012/10/14/the-architect/</link>
	<description>The Evolution of a Godless Revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:25:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amii Lockhart</title>
		<link>http://theamericanheathen.com/2012/10/14/the-architect/#comment-5956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amii Lockhart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 04:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theamericanheathen.com/?p=4002#comment-5956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I was being coy as well.  I&#039;m not trying to bait you into some flame war; I just haven&#039;t seen that and want to know what you consider censorship, and more specifically, censorship of words for the very sake of their existence.  I&#039;m hoping that you don&#039;t consider such idiosynchratic things like comment moderation to be censorship.  Surely you do not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I was being coy as well.  I&#8217;m not trying to bait you into some flame war; I just haven&#8217;t seen that and want to know what you consider censorship, and more specifically, censorship of words for the very sake of their existence.  I&#8217;m hoping that you don&#8217;t consider such idiosynchratic things like comment moderation to be censorship.  Surely you do not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amii Lockhart</title>
		<link>http://theamericanheathen.com/2012/10/14/the-architect/#comment-5954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amii Lockhart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 03:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theamericanheathen.com/?p=4002#comment-5954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three examples should suffice, that indicate there is a movement seeking to censor words for the sake of their existence.  Why be coy?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three examples should suffice, that indicate there is a movement seeking to censor words for the sake of their existence.  Why be coy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Stefanelli</title>
		<link>http://theamericanheathen.com/2012/10/14/the-architect/#comment-5950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Stefanelli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theamericanheathen.com/?p=4002#comment-5950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seriously?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amii Lockhart</title>
		<link>http://theamericanheathen.com/2012/10/14/the-architect/#comment-5949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amii Lockhart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theamericanheathen.com/?p=4002#comment-5949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It saddens me is that there is a movement within the freethought community to censor words, just for the sake of their existence – giving no thought to context.&quot;

Your whole piece is centered on this premise, yet I&#039;ve seen no evidence of such censorship taking place.  Please provide some quotes, links or any other evidence that this might be a problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It saddens me is that there is a movement within the freethought community to censor words, just for the sake of their existence – giving no thought to context.&#8221;</p>
<p>Your whole piece is centered on this premise, yet I&#8217;ve seen no evidence of such censorship taking place.  Please provide some quotes, links or any other evidence that this might be a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latinatheistgal</title>
		<link>http://theamericanheathen.com/2012/10/14/the-architect/#comment-5914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Latinatheistgal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theamericanheathen.com/?p=4002#comment-5914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed this post and the crazy replies made me laugh. I am a Hispanic female, born in Mexico, raised south of the border (but married to a Gringo), which would make me a goddamn wetback spic and a bitch. Double whammy! I&#039;m also an atheist so I&#039;ve been called worse and it always makes me laugh! I have ZERO hang-ups with my racial identity and I constantly poke fun at myself, at my overly religious comadres and at the delightful quirks in the glorious Mexican American community. Yes, I CAN do it &#039;cause I&#039;m one of &#039;em! 

I LOVE the English language and I read atheist blogs to give me the language I need to engage in arguments with my comadres. I have enough tongue for ten rows of teeth and I&#039;m constantly arguing atheism in Spanish. I can translate the arguments into Spanish and understand the reasoning but I absolutely crave the rhythm, the poetry, the explosion of meanings, the pinch of sarcasm, the building of words, in English. 

I too have been censored by the &quot;Hurt Feelings Police&quot; for using words/expressions like &quot;squirting bellyfruit&quot;, capacious vaginal dimensions, semen demons, Fundamngelical, wide-eyed Christoholic, Mormon haircut, crotch droppings, baby-addicted mother, Christian kidbots, hysterical breeding using a hydraulic pump and a revolving door, the Dead-Guy-On-A-Stick (Jesus), etc., all in reference to creepy Dominionists like Frau Michelle Duggar of Arkansas.

 I AVOID atheist blogs with politically correct, humorless, dour,  moderators who believe in serving a slice of Kumbaya pie with a dollop of delusion so as to accommodate religionistas who are clearly two sandwiches short of  a picnic. Now, I&#039;m not saying that I&#039;m not as crazy as an acre of snakes but I believe in allowing expressions, ideas, blasphemy, even if it ticks someone to the point of making them lock themselves inside their prayer closet...as long as they are not strapped to explosives. I took my daughter to Israel and Jordan this summer on a back packing trip. We both came back with an appreciation for freedom of speech and glad that in this country, no one has the right not to be offended.

Thank you, Mr. Stefanelli!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this post and the crazy replies made me laugh. I am a Hispanic female, born in Mexico, raised south of the border (but married to a Gringo), which would make me a goddamn wetback spic and a bitch. Double whammy! I&#8217;m also an atheist so I&#8217;ve been called worse and it always makes me laugh! I have ZERO hang-ups with my racial identity and I constantly poke fun at myself, at my overly religious comadres and at the delightful quirks in the glorious Mexican American community. Yes, I CAN do it &#8217;cause I&#8217;m one of &#8216;em! </p>
<p>I LOVE the English language and I read atheist blogs to give me the language I need to engage in arguments with my comadres. I have enough tongue for ten rows of teeth and I&#8217;m constantly arguing atheism in Spanish. I can translate the arguments into Spanish and understand the reasoning but I absolutely crave the rhythm, the poetry, the explosion of meanings, the pinch of sarcasm, the building of words, in English. </p>
<p>I too have been censored by the &#8220;Hurt Feelings Police&#8221; for using words/expressions like &#8220;squirting bellyfruit&#8221;, capacious vaginal dimensions, semen demons, Fundamngelical, wide-eyed Christoholic, Mormon haircut, crotch droppings, baby-addicted mother, Christian kidbots, hysterical breeding using a hydraulic pump and a revolving door, the Dead-Guy-On-A-Stick (Jesus), etc., all in reference to creepy Dominionists like Frau Michelle Duggar of Arkansas.</p>
<p> I AVOID atheist blogs with politically correct, humorless, dour,  moderators who believe in serving a slice of Kumbaya pie with a dollop of delusion so as to accommodate religionistas who are clearly two sandwiches short of  a picnic. Now, I&#8217;m not saying that I&#8217;m not as crazy as an acre of snakes but I believe in allowing expressions, ideas, blasphemy, even if it ticks someone to the point of making them lock themselves inside their prayer closet&#8230;as long as they are not strapped to explosives. I took my daughter to Israel and Jordan this summer on a back packing trip. We both came back with an appreciation for freedom of speech and glad that in this country, no one has the right not to be offended.</p>
<p>Thank you, Mr. Stefanelli!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Hermit</title>
		<link>http://theamericanheathen.com/2012/10/14/the-architect/#comment-5912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Hermit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theamericanheathen.com/?p=4002#comment-5912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carlin never argued for the gratuitous use of language; on the contrary his intent was to make use of language in a way that gets a message across; that it&#039;s not the words which are offensive, its the way in which the words are used that can be offensive.

If your message is &quot;women who stand up for their rights are bitches&quot; that&#039;s no different than&quot;black people who stand up for their rights are niggers&quot;. Too often these days that does seem to be the message being sent to feminists in the atheist community...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlin never argued for the gratuitous use of language; on the contrary his intent was to make use of language in a way that gets a message across; that it&#8217;s not the words which are offensive, its the way in which the words are used that can be offensive.</p>
<p>If your message is &#8220;women who stand up for their rights are bitches&#8221; that&#8217;s no different than&#8221;black people who stand up for their rights are niggers&#8221;. Too often these days that does seem to be the message being sent to feminists in the atheist community&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Doswell</title>
		<link>http://theamericanheathen.com/2012/10/14/the-architect/#comment-5909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Doswell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theamericanheathen.com/?p=4002#comment-5909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;hotshoe&quot; - just another lame-ass who&#039;s evidently afraid to use his/her own name.  By what authority do you have the right to conclude that Al&#039;s comments don&#039;t qualify him as an &quot;architect of words&quot;?  Why should anyone respect your opinion on that issue?  You&#039;ve not provided any reason I can discern.  

I&#039;m surprised your pitiful &quot;comment&quot; - which is just a pointless ad hominem attack on Al -  made it through moderation, here.  It&#039;s a testament to RJ&#039;s patience, I suppose.  Freedom and liberty for ALL even includes you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;hotshoe&#8221; &#8211; just another lame-ass who&#8217;s evidently afraid to use his/her own name.  By what authority do you have the right to conclude that Al&#8217;s comments don&#8217;t qualify him as an &#8220;architect of words&#8221;?  Why should anyone respect your opinion on that issue?  You&#8217;ve not provided any reason I can discern.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised your pitiful &#8220;comment&#8221; &#8211; which is just a pointless ad hominem attack on Al &#8211;  made it through moderation, here.  It&#8217;s a testament to RJ&#8217;s patience, I suppose.  Freedom and liberty for ALL even includes you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Stefanelli</title>
		<link>http://theamericanheathen.com/2012/10/14/the-architect/#comment-5906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Stefanelli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theamericanheathen.com/?p=4002#comment-5906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ophelia Benson, on her blog  &quot;Butterflies &amp; Wheels&quot; over at Freethought Blogs, has written an entire post in response to this post. Fine, we appreciate the hits.

However, (and I stated this in a comment that at this time is in &#039;moderation&#039;), her insistence that the word &#039;bitch&#039; is on par with racial or ethnic slurs is ridiculous.

She proceeds to list a litany of racial and ethnic slurs, but seems to fail to understand that these words are used as pejoratives toward someone who is born that way. 

Nobody is born a bitch, unless you&#039;re referring to a female dog. By the way, I find it amusing that she is more than willing to use those words. 

Oh, wait. That would be &#039;context.&#039; Nevermind.

You can read her blog here:

http://www.http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterfliesandwheels/2012/10/carlin-isnt-the-issue/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ophelia Benson, on her blog  &#8220;Butterflies &amp; Wheels&#8221; over at Freethought Blogs, has written an entire post in response to this post. Fine, we appreciate the hits.</p>
<p>However, (and I stated this in a comment that at this time is in &#8216;moderation&#8217;), her insistence that the word &#8216;bitch&#8217; is on par with racial or ethnic slurs is ridiculous.</p>
<p>She proceeds to list a litany of racial and ethnic slurs, but seems to fail to understand that these words are used as pejoratives toward someone who is born that way. </p>
<p>Nobody is born a bitch, unless you&#8217;re referring to a female dog. By the way, I find it amusing that she is more than willing to use those words. </p>
<p>Oh, wait. That would be &#8216;context.&#8217; Nevermind.</p>
<p>You can read her blog here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterfliesandwheels/2012/10/carlin-isnt-the-issue/" rel="nofollow">http://www.http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterfliesandwheels/2012/10/carlin-isnt-the-issue/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotshoe</title>
		<link>http://theamericanheathen.com/2012/10/14/the-architect/#comment-5905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hotshoe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theamericanheathen.com/?p=4002#comment-5905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ferchrissake, Al. You pretentious ass, you’re not a “wordsmith” or a goddamn “architect”. You’re a silly little blogger with a handful of deluded fans. Your choice to use the word “bitch” on your blog doesn’t magically elevate you to the rank of “wordsmith”, much less to the rank of valiant “hero” fighting against the would-be censors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ferchrissake, Al. You pretentious ass, you’re not a “wordsmith” or a goddamn “architect”. You’re a silly little blogger with a handful of deluded fans. Your choice to use the word “bitch” on your blog doesn’t magically elevate you to the rank of “wordsmith”, much less to the rank of valiant “hero” fighting against the would-be censors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlin isn&#8217;t the issue &#124; Butterflies and Wheels</title>
		<link>http://theamericanheathen.com/2012/10/14/the-architect/#comment-5904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carlin isn&#8217;t the issue &#124; Butterflies and Wheels]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theamericanheathen.com/?p=4002#comment-5904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] day, another Internet radio show, another transcript, another attempt to make the problem just a matter of swearing. &#8230;there is nothing that is placed outside of purpose, especially words, and what words I use [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] day, another Internet radio show, another transcript, another attempt to make the problem just a matter of swearing. &#8230;there is nothing that is placed outside of purpose, especially words, and what words I use [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
