Archive for June, 2011

“Because I Said So!”

Posted in Religion on June 24, 2011 by RJ Evans

(Editorial Comment from  host RJ Evans on his American Heathen® radio show – Air Date 06/24/11)

It’s the same old thing.  It’s the same  old, tired,  bullshit response to an argument.  It is designed to negate further discussion or debate, and it’s the ultimate escape.  What is it?  The statement, “Because I said so!” Also called an argument from authority, this lame retort and all it’s variations are most effective when used on small children. But, the religious use it with abandon on anyone who questions their extraordinary claims.  At its very core, “Because I said so!” isn’t an appeal to any form of reason.  It’s simply a demand for capitulation and compliance without question based on presumed authority, and used to avoid detection of total ignorance. “Because I said so!” is religion’s last resort when confronted with logic, reason, and evidence.  “Because I said so!” is really no different than “I have faith!”.  Both sentences state the obvious…  that no amount of logic, reason, and evidence will convince the person to reconsider because they consider themselves to be the ultimate authority.

“Because I said so!” are the words of adults who don’t have fact based answers to questions of “Why?”  They would much rather force an end to the conversation, based on their self-appointed authority.  They’re uncomfortable with reality based thinking.  It’s better to know nothing and pretend to know something that no one else knows, than it is to actually take the time to investigate and learn, or to simply say “I don’t know”.

Of course, when it comes to children, the adult is always right. “Because I said so!” is always an easy way to shut a child up, at least until the child grows up and discovers just how stupid and ignorant their parents really are.  You see, parents aren’t infallible.  In total opposition to what children are taught to believe, parents are not gods, they’re human.  But don’t try to tell the religious that they’re human and fallible. While they may claim humility before their skydaddy, when it comes to practice in reality, they are arrogant assholes in the first degree.  They truly believe they have a direct connection to the supernatural.  And, because of this they have a strong tendency to claim knowledge of the unknowable. They also ignore facts and evidence in opposition.  They actually believe they have a special power that appoints and anoints them in all things beyond this world.  That is until they can’t answer a logical question in defense of their illogical position.  They stammer and stumble over their words and try to re-direct the discussion.  When that fails, they hop on-board  the self-righteousness train and lay claim to godlike status and proclaim “Because I said so!” when they don’t know shit from chocolate. Suddenly they’re parents,  and anyone who doesn’t fall into line with the skydaddy… they’re just mindless children… fuck their questions of “Why?”  You see, the question “Why?” is too difficult to answer when it comes to their illogical  skydaddy belief, and they know it.  If you corner them, “Because I said so!” is a quick and dirty response in hopes of intimidating you into dropping the subject.

“Because I said so!” really is a self-aggrandizing, cut-your-losses and run, bullshit excuse for total intellectual ignorance.  I mean, think about it,  Where does their supposed authority come from?  God?  God spoke to them? Jesus popped into their room one night, rolled them over and anointed their forehead with the holy jizz of the jesus penis?

The fact is that anyone who claims authority through knowledge of the unknowable, the supernatural, and at the same time espouses a “God works in mysterious ways” mantra, is delusional and a candidate for psychotherapy.  Of course, delusions are the very foundation of religion.  Religion thrives on it. It also encourages psychosis, paranoia, depression, low self-esteem and a bad case of  “I’m a miserable evil human being and it’s your fault, but I’m still better than you because I believe in sky fairies”. You really believe that?  Why?  Oh I know… “Because I said so!”

It could never happen here~~~Could it?

Posted in Politics, Religion on June 24, 2011 by hewhay

(The following commentary is part of a weekly series called “Yahweh Speaks” by Yahweh.  Yahweh is an assumed name to protect his identity on-line.  He is a noted  free thought advocate and Constitutional attorney.  His series airs on my American Heathen® internet radio show. Airdate 06/24/11)

Attorney General Eric Holder recently defended the prosecution of terrorism suspects in civilian court after the top-ranking Senate Republican urged him to send two Iraqis to Guantánamo Bay rather than try them in Kentucky.These PRESUMPTIVELY INNOCENT PERSONS were legal immigrants  to the US, Kentucky residents, who now are being accused of supporting terrorism.

Holder deplored what he described  as a “rigid ideology” among political opponents working to prevent terror trials that have been successfully handled by civilian courts hundreds of times.  “Politics has no place – no place – in the impartial and effective administration of justice,” Holder said in remarks  prepared for a convention of the American Constitution Society. “Decisions about how, where, and when to prosecute must be made by prosecutors, not politicians”, said Holder.  Republican Senate Minority Leader , Mitch McConnell, decried Holder’s speech, saying,  “There is wide, bipartisan opposition to giving the rights of U.S. citizens to men who tried to kill our troops on the battlefield,”…”Unfortunately, this administration has been working since its first week in office to do just that, regardless of the opposition in those communities or their elected leaders in Congress.”

McConnell evinces ignorance of or conscious disregard, for his own political purposes, of those portions of the Constitution that  apply ONLY to citizens and those provisions that apply to ALL PERSONS.

Holder correctly asserted that civilian courts are “our most effective terror-fighting weapon.”  “Despite this reality, we continue to see overheated rhetoric that is detached from history – and from the facts,” Holder said. “We see crucial national security tools, once again, being put at risk by those who disparage the American criminal justice system and misguidedly claim that terror suspects cannot be tried safely in our civilian courts.”

If this has a ring of historical familiarity, it OUGHT!

A similar debate raged briefly in Germany in the 1930s and 40s. There, Jews, although protected by German law, were “redefined” as “guests”  merely residing in the country and not entitled to full rights of citizens. They were again “reclassified” as “enemies of the State” and  deported to concentration camps where they were brutalized and butchered to the tune of some 6 million persons.

But, this can not happen in the United States  because we are protected by the Fifth Amendment , which says “No PERSON shall be deprived of life , liberty or property without due process of law.”   We are further protected by the 14th Amendment, which says, “nor shall any State deprive ANY PERSON of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to ANY PERSON within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”.

So, this can not happen in the United States…or can it?

Remember the Alien and Sedition Acts of the 1790s, which  made it a criminal offense to criticize the government?

Remember “Jim Crow Laws” that deprived   blacks of equal protection of the Laws?

Remember other State and city laws that prevented women , Jews, Irish, Chinese and other “non persons” the right to vote, hold office, or even live in certain areas?

Remember the roundup and detention of Japanese -American citizens during WWII?

Remember the words of MCConnell and other modern fascists, including their fellow travelers, those Authoritarian  4 or 5 members of the Supreme Court.

REMEMBER…all it takes to deprive another PERSON of due process or equal protection of the law is to “reclassify” that PERSON so as NOT to be a “PERSON” in the eyes of the law, or to redefine  the “due process” to which CERTAIN “persons” are entitled.

WE—-ALL of us, ANY of us are only as safe as the weakest among us. We are only as secure as the  most despised among us. We are only as “equal” as the lowest among, because at the drop of the hat or the turn of a phrase we can be reclassified as an “enemy of the state” and deprived of fundamental rights. It may have been the “Islamist terrorists” yesterday.  It may be the “enemy combatant” today. It may be YOU and ME tomorrow!

“But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.”

Minute Maniac #19

Posted in Religion on June 22, 2011 by RJ Evans

After selling off everything he owns and drowning his sorrow in antidepressants over the failure of the “Rapture”, the Maniac has managed to bounce back.  Being poor seems to agree with him.  After all, he has lots of faith.  Unfortunately, he also has lots of problems.

Don’t Pray For Me

Posted in Religion on June 20, 2011 by RJ Evans

Pat Condell really does a fine job of presenting exactly what I think, feel and say.  So, take Pat’s words as mine.  Don’t pray for me.  You’re wasting your time and mine.

A Nation Of Pissers And Moaners

Posted in Politics, Religion with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on June 17, 2011 by RJ Evans

(Editorial Comment from  host RJ Evans on his American Heathen® radio show – Air Date 06/17/11)

As Governor Rick Perry of Texas rallies for a national religious revival with “The Response”, and as perspective candidates – of whom Perry is one – jockey for the coveted position of Presidential hopeful of the Christian Nationalist Party (GOP), the economy, jobs, healthcare, and a whole shit load of other problems continue to plague the country.  Now, more than ever according to the Right, is a time for prayer and reflection to save our country from its perils.  “Pray to jesus”, they say.  “Turn to god” they insist.  The fear factory of the CNP is running at full capacity, trying to frighten the masses into jumping headlong into the boiling caldron of jesus juice. The foundation of our Democratic Republic, Separation of Church and State, the most sacred of our principles, the nation’s life-preserver, is being scrapped, thrown away and replaced with the cement shoes of theocratic design.  Governor Rick Perry has made an offer no one can refuse, and he has absolutely no regard for anyone or anything that stands in his way.  Including the Constitution. More than just a minor violation of the most important aspect of our Constitution, Perry is literally out to “convert” everyone to christianity.  And, it is claimed, the nation will find the answers in jesus and be better off for it.

Prayer? Really? Nothing fails like prayer.  But, don’t try to tell anyone who believes in the ancient skybaby that prayer is nothing but a personal piss and moan fest.  All they care about is how good they feel when their prayer bladders are empty.  Fuck the rest of the country.  But, that’s the way it’s supposed to work.  The nation’s problems are no match for the power of prayer when believers come together to pray.  Right?  You know, I find the whole idea of prayer during a national crisis analogous to a bunch of firefighters showing up at a five alarm blaze, whipping their dicks out, and then pissing on the flames.  Yeah sure… it must feel good to relieve themselves, but while they dribble, shake, and then moan in personal satisfaction, the whole fucking building burns to the ground.

Unfortunately, America has become a nation of pissers and moaners.  It’s all about personal satisfaction without personal responsibility.  Even the moderate christians insist that prayer can solve problems.  But, in the meantime, nothing ever gets done, problems still exist, and no one has the fortitude to actually do something to solve the problems this country faces.  In fact, whether the problems are personal or otherwise, it seems that a shit load of people would rather piss and moan (pray) their way through life and blame the lack of answers to their pissing and moaning (prayers) on those who don’t piss and moan.

So, if you believe in the skybaby go ahead and piss and moan, or as I call it ‘pray and make yourself feel better’.  Go ahead.  Put a stream of useless mythological skybaby urine on the massive, out of control reality blaze.  Go ahead and moan in personal relief when your prayer bladder is empty.  But, don’t piss and moan when there’s nothing left to piss and moan about.  Because, quite frankly, you’re the one who pissed it all away.

Where Are the Churches?

Posted in Politics, Religion on June 17, 2011 by RJ Evans

(The following commentary is part of a weekly series called “Reflections” by John MillJohn is a noted free thought advocate and broadcaster.  His series airs on my American Heathen® internet radio show. Air date of this particular segment: 06/17/11)

My wife keeps urging me to be more gentle in my criticism of the churches and religion. She says she sees the good the churches do: the charity, the sense of community, the sense of having and belonging for those who have not and might otherwise feel alone. You may not believe it, but I do try to do what she says – and not just because, like most men in a committed relationship, I’d rather be happy than right.

This is John Mill and I’ve been standing here a long time with a bouquet for religion, like a teenager waiting for his blind date to show up. But the flowers are beginning to wilt under the lowering clouds.

Where are the churches?

Politicians, especially but not solely of the Republican or “Christian Nationalist” persuasion, vie for piety in the public eye. We saw this in the debate among seven Republican presidential hopefuls on Tuesday. Every one of them speaks for God and thinks God is good for everyone else.

Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota thinks “we’re a nation that’s founded under God” and cleverly points out that our blessings come from a creator, not a county commissioner.

Former Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania thinks people of no faith should “tolerate” people of faith like him.

Congressman Ron Paul of Texas also thinks Christians need everyone else to tolerate the free “expression of your Christian faith in a public place.”

Godfather’s Pizza mogul Herman Cain of Georgia isn’t able keep his mind off the Muslims “that are trying to kill us.”

Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney said, even though “Our nation was founded on a principal of religious tolerance,” he’s not going to allow any Muslim law.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich of Georgia thinks loyalty oaths are OK, just in case people lie about their loyalty.

Congresswoman Michele Bachmann of Minnesota defended her abrogation of reproductive rights for women by saying “Only God can give, and only God can take” life, which I guess would make her an opponent of capital punishment.

Another politician, who at this point is only a potential candidate, Texas Governor Rick Perry thinks he has a direct, digital connection with God. He has allied himself with the American Family Association, which is famously anti-gay and anti-Muslim, and he is publicly urging everybody – as Governor of Texas – to convert to Christianity.

Where are the churches? I’m waiting with my bouquet like an eager groom.

Joblessness in the US is at a staggering 9.1 percent – not counting the 2.2 million people who have dropped out of the workforce. The US is involved in three foreign wars without any definable security interest to justify. The wealthiest people in the country get favors from the public purse – tax breaks and “free speech” rights that let them acquire and keep an ever-greater share of our wealth – without any noticeable payback to citizens.

Where are the churches when deficits are an excuse for cutting public jobs and public services that help the middle class – when even one less war could pay for them all?

Where are the churches when murder is being done in our name just to keep government contractors wealthy with the blood and treasure of the people least able to afford them?

Where are the churches when Wall Street fiddles while American homeowners burn, when our environment is degraded by wasteful use, when our infrastructure crumbles through neglect?

Singing “Jesus Loves Me” in church never lifted one American out of poverty. Posting a copy of the 10 Commandments in a school never got anybody into college. Passing laws to make abortion difficult never helped one mother feed her child. Making gay marriage illegal never stopped one divorce. Failing to teach about contraception never prevented one teenage girl from getting pregnant. Evangelizing for Jesus never repaired a rotting road or beefed up a broken bridge.

And none of these things got anybody a job, or a home, or helped to support a family.

Where are the churches? I don’t believe God has seen the inside of a church for a long time. I think I’ve been stood up again. And my bouquet just died. This is John Mill.

This Week In Freethought History (June 11th – 17th)

Posted in Politics, Religion on June 17, 2011 by RJ Evans

(The following is a transcript of a LIVE broadcast by John Mill. John is a noted free thought advocate and broadcaster. “This Week In Freethought” airs on my American Heathen® internet radio show. Air date of this particular segment: 06/17/11)

Here’s your Week in Freethought History: This is more than just a calendar of events or mini-biographies – it’s an affirmation that we as freethinkers are neither unique nor alone in the world, no matter how isolated and alone we may feel at times.

1. Last Saturday, June 11, but in 1864, German composer Richard Strauss was born. Strauss pretty much exemplified the prodigy: he played the piano at age four and began composing at age seven. But at the Royal Grammar School he absorbed a classical education, and at Munich University, Strauss studied philosophy, aesthetics and art history. His musical successes in tone poem and opera were many, even without being related to the Viennese Waltz family. The Encyclopedia Britannica calls Strauss’s famous Till Eulenspiegels Merry Pranks (1894) “one of the most brilliant dramatic scores ever penned.” What the encyclopedia doesn’t mention is the Rationalist philosophy evident in the piece. Strauss followed that work with what has become known as the theme music for the Stanley Kubrick film, 2001: A Space Odyssey. Also Sprach Zarathustra (1896) was based on the work of the notoriously skeptical Friedrich Nietzsche. Its premiere caused great consternation in the German churches.

It was also on June 11, but in 1572, that English playwright Ben Jonson was born. At Westminster School, Jonson was instructed by the classical scholar William Camden (1551-1623), who lit the fire of his desire for the classics. He must have made a name for himself by 1597 because he was imprisoned in the Marshalsea for co-writing a satirical play that was declared seditious and is now lost, The Isle of Dogs. His playwriting continued to be politically volatile: “What excellent fools religion makes of men,” he wrote in his 1603 tragedy, Sejanus, His Fall. The play was a public failure, but caused him to be interrogated by the privy council for “popery and treason” – popery an accusation of being Catholic. Two years later, in Volpone, Jonson tweaked the clergy by writing, “Hood an ass with reverend purple, so you can hide his two ambitious ears, and he shall pass for a cathedral doctor.”

2. Last Sunday, June 12, but in 1381, Wat Tyler’s Rebellion, a peasants revolt, began. Geoffrey Chaucer was about 41. The 1300s, or what historian Barbara Tuchman calls “The Calamitous 14th Century,” was theoretically an Age of Chivalry, but in fact a time of superstition, faith, the Black Death, great cathedrals, great poverty, great ignorance, brutal punishment, sexual license and corruption, especially in the Church. Many peasant-serfs were compelled to work for free on church lands, which made it difficult for workers to support their families. Taxes were imposed. Wat Tyler, who lived in Maidstone, Essex, was outraged when an overzealous tax collector sought to determine if Tyler’s young daughter was of taxable age. He stripped the girl naked and sexually assaulted her. With a hammer, Tyler smashed in the tax collector’s skull. His fellow peasants cheered and banded together to seek redress from 14-year-old King Richard II. Their party grew to 100,000 strong and converged on London. Artisans and tradesmen provided food and shelter along the way, and the rebels attacked abbeys and monasteries, those bastions of idle wealth and ecclesiastical corruption. The next thing the mob did was kill all the lawyers and judges they could find, and release their brother peasants from prison. In London, Tyler and his band, still in the grip of the myth of the “divine right,” believed the king a natural ally of the poor. Richard seized the moment and declared to the mob, “Wat Tyler was a traitor. I’ll be your leader.” The teenaged monarch immediately agreed to all the rebel demands – chiefly, the abolition of serfdom – and they went home. Thereupon the king reneged on his promises and hunted down and hanged 1500 of the rebels after trials in which the judge told the jurors that he would hang them if they didn’t convict. So the oppression of the peasants persisted, the churches and priests continued to ignore them in preference to their royal patrons, and Richard, king of England by divine right, declared to the peasants seeking an end to their slavery, “Villeins ye are, and villeins ye shall remain.”

3. Last Monday, June 13, but in 1865, Irish poet and playwright, William Butler Yeats, was born. He spent much time in London, where he became close with such Rationalists as poet William Ernest Henley (1849-1903), artist William Morris (1834-1896), and poet and playwright Arthur Symons (1865-1945). In addition to his poetry, Yeats wrote twenty-six plays. He cannot properly be claimed by any Christian sect. Yeats criticized Christianity in his poem, “The Second Coming,” in which he mixes pagan and Christian symbolism in a horror-filled vision of the rebirth of paganism from a dead Christianity. Furthermore, in 1937 Yeats opposed the adoption of Article 44 of the Irish Constitution, which would have established a state religion, saying, “Once you attempt legislation on religious grounds, you open the way for every kind of intolerance and religious persecution.”

4. Last Tuesday, June 14, the United States celebrated Flag Day. June 14 was the date in 1777 that the Continental Congress proposed that the United States should have its own national flag. The date was officially established by President Woodrow Wilson on 30 May 1916. On 3 August 1949, President Harry Truman signed an Act of Congress designating June 14th of each year as National Flag Day. It is important to remember that the US flag is not an object of worship, and that Flag Day is not a religious observance. Flag Day is instead a celebration of the nation the flag represents. Far from being founded on Biblical principles, the United States was the first nation in history to be founded on Enlightenment principles: empiricism, individual rights and science. This trinity of secular principles cannot be found anywhere in Bible, Torah, Koran or any other holy book and were not handed to humanity by some divinity. It is also important to remember that what the flag represents is more important than the physical flag itself. That is why – especially in a country whose Constitution’s First Amendment protects nothing if it does not protect political speech – a federal law banning the burning of the flag as a form of protest is clearly unconstitutional, as well as contradictory.

It was also on this date, June 14, 1954, that President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a Congressional resolution which added the words “under God” to the Pledge of Allegiance. The pledge, which Congress had recognized officially a dozen years earlier, was originally written in August of 1892 by Francis Bellamy (1855-1931), a Baptist minister, and active Socialist. The Pledge was first published in a children’s magazine, Youth’s Companion, to celebrate the 400th anniversary of Columbus’ arrival in the Americas. The original 22 words were:

I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

Bellamy considered including the word “equality” in the pledge, but decided against it to avoid offending the many Americans who opposed equal rights for women and blacks. The American Legion and the Daughters of the American Revolution in 1924 changed “my Flag” to “the Flag of the United States of America.” On 22 April 1951, the Board of Directors of the Roman Catholic men’s group, the Knights of Columbus, mounted a campaign to add the words “under God,” after the words “one nation,” in the Pledge. “Apart from the mention of the phrase the United States of America,” wrote a supporter, “it could be the pledge of any republic. In fact, I could hear little Muscovites repeat a similar pledge to their hammer-and-sickle flag in Moscow.” Eisenhower was impressed. News spread, public opinion grew. A bill to add “God” to the Pledge was approved as a Congressional joint resolution on 8 June 1954. It was signed into law on that Flag Day, June 14. It is odd, therefore, that many have forgotten that Americans fought and died in two World Wars and the Korean conflict without acknowledging God in their Pledge of Allegiance. And those who claim that everything has gone downhill in this country since the 1950s – when amending the Pledge divided the nation into believers and non-believers – might reflect that adding “under God” to the Pledge didn’t help!

5. Last Wednesday, June 15, but in 1520, Pope Leo X (p. 1513-1521) issued the Bull Exsurge Domine (Arise, O Lord), condemning Martin Luther for forty-one doctrinal errors and threatening him with excommunication if he would not recant. The pope, born Giovanni de’ Medici (1475-1521), was the son of a wealthy, powerful and politically connected family. His father got him into the priesthood at age 7; he was a cardinal at 13; he became Pope at age 37, at which newly minted Leo X remarked gleefully, “Let us enjoy this Papacy which God has given us.” The historian and statesman, Francesco Guicciardini (1483-1540), gives us a fascinating précis of Pope Leo’s lifestyle: “His expenditure was such that he degraded the spiritual authority, corrupted the Papal Court, and was compelled to be always in search of extraordinary methods of raising money. He was passionately fond of music and jesters, and his mind was entirely occupied with these. In the early days of his pontificate many believed that he was quite chaste, but it was discovered that he was excessively devoted to pleasures that cannot even be mentioned with decency.” Those unmentionable pleasures, described delicately as “venery,” were not in fact sporting with hawks, but sporting with young boys. Leo X spent lavishly on banquets, entertainments, jewels and gifts. He was lying and duplicitous in diplomacy and raised money through the sale of offices and indulgences, which combined simony with nepotism. Threatening to cut him off from the Catholic community in the 1520 Bull, Leo finally excommunicated Luther on 3 January 1521. At last the Romans had had enough and Leo succumbed to a poisoning on 1 Dec 1521, although modern Catholic historians dispute the physicians who actually saw the dark and swollen body. Luther, inhibited by neither Exsurge Domine nor his excommunication, outlived the next two Popes.

6. Yesterday, June 16, but in 1824, the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals was founded in a London pub. It was the first society in history set up to end animal cruelty, so you may wonder why it took the religion of Gentle Jesus and St. Francis of Assisi so long to condemn the ill-treatment of the lower branches on the evolutionary tree. It all started on the sixth day of creation (Genesis 1:26, 28):

“And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. …And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.”

We’re a little behind on the replenishing part, but the “dominion over” nature command humankind has nailed! It never occurred to Christians that animals were anything but the personal playthings of people: after all, God created the creatures of the earth, air and water for our use, not for our protection. Bear-baiting, cock-fighting, the mistreatment of draft animals and brutality toward stray cats and dogs, were no laughing matter to Richard Martin (1754-1834), an Irish member of Parliament who got “Martin’s Act” against animal cruelty passed in Parliament. He was nicknamed “Humanity Dick” by King George IV. Two years later, on this date in 1824, at Old Slaughter’s Coffee House, Martin oversaw the founding of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, which put teeth into Martin’s Act. His efforts so impressed Queen Victoria that, in 1840, the SPCA was renamed the Royal SPCA, as they have been known ever since.

7. Finally, today, June 17, but in 1782, the last legal execution of a witch occurred in Switzerland. From the records we know that Anna Goeldi was hanged in Glarus, Switzerland. It is a fact that in those days attempts to explain the world in non-scriptural, non-superstitious terms were either ignored or punished. But all of Christian Europe joined in the witch hunting primarily because, in the absence of a scientific explanation of the bad things in the world, such as disease, pestilence, storms and comets, people resorted to belief in magic and superstition. For suppressing science, the churches have complete culpability for the bloodshed. Confessions of witchcraft were often extracted under torture – and not only was torture supported by the clergy, based on scripture, but the accuracy of confessions acquired under torture was scripturally supported. And why not? If God punishes his creatures with tortures “infinite in cruelty and duration,” why shouldn’t his ministers on earth imitate him? As late as 1768 in Protestant England, John Wesley, the original Methodist, maintained that, “The giving up of witchcraft is in effect the giving up of the Bible.” And there were a few more sputterings of witch executions: in Italy in 1791, and in Poland in 1793. But in the witch-hunting heartland of Switzerland, the delusion died with Anna Goeldi on this date only 229 years ago.

We can look back, but the Golden Age of Freethought is now. You can find full versions of these pages in Freethought history at the links in the American Heathen blog, which take you to my blog, FreethoughtAlmanac.com.

There is NO “reason” IN or FOR revealed religion

Posted in Politics, Religion on June 17, 2011 by hewhay

(The following commentary is part of a weekly series called “Yahweh Speaks” by Yahweh.  Yahweh is an assumed name to protect his identity on-line.  He is a noted  free thought advocate and Constitutional attorney.  His series airs on my American Heathen® internet radio show. Airdate 06/17/11)

There is no “reason” IN or FOR “revealed religion”. Let me repeat that: “There is no “reason” IN or FOR “revealed religion”.

All three of the Abrahamic Religions are ENTIRLEY premised on YHVH having mystical, secret, and solitary   conversations with Moses, Je-zeus, and Mohammed.

Adherents are required to suspend “disbelief” and accept as factual, historical and inerrant that each of these three itinerant Semites of centuries long past had one-on-one experiential relations with the purported divine.

I, of course, refuse to suspend disbelief, I  and demand actual proof, of which none has ever been, nor likely will ever be, produced. I suppose many of you, likewise ,rightfully, logically, and reasonably refuse to suspend disbelief.

We share the honored company of two “doubting Thomases”: Thomas Paine and Thomas Jefferson.

Thomas Paine said:
“Revelation then, so far as the term has relation between God and man, can only be applied to something which God reveals of his will to man; but though the power of the Almighty to make such a communication is necessarily admitted, because to that power all things are possible, yet the thing so revealed (if anything ever was revealed, and which, bye the bye, it is impossible to prove), is revelation to the person only to whom it is made. His account of it to another person is not revelation; and whoever puts faith in that account, puts it in the man from whom the account comes; and that man may have been deceived, or may have dreamed it, or he may be an impostor and may lie. There is no possible criterion whereby to judge of the truth of what he tells, for even the morality of it would be no proof of revelation. In all such cases the proper answer would be, “When it is revealed to me, I will believe it to be a revelation; but it is not, and cannot be incumbent upon me to believe it to be revelation before; neither is it proper that I should take the word of a man as the word of God, and put man in the place of God.” This is the manner in which I have spoken of revelation in the former part of the Age of Reason; and which, while it reverentially admits revelation as a possible thing, because, as before said, to the Almighty all things are possible, it prevents the imposition of one man upon another, and precludes the wicked use of pretended revelation. But though, speaking for myself, I thus admit the possibility of revelation, I totally disbelieve that the Almighty ever did communicate anything to man, by any mode of speech, in any language, or by any kind of vision, or appearance, or by any means which our senses are capable of receiving, otherwise than by the universal display of himself in the works of the creation, and by that repugnance we feel in ourselves to bad actions, and the disposition to do good ones.” Paine , “The Age of Reason, Part II”

Thomas Jefferson said:
“It is between fifty and sixty years since I read it(Revelations) and I then considered it as merely the ravings of a maniac no more worthy nor capable of explanation than the incoherences of our own nightly dreams. …There is not coherence enough in them to countenance any suite of rational ideas. You will judge therefore from this how impossible I think it that either your explanation or that of any man in the heavens above or on the earth beneath can be a correct one. What has no meaning admits no explanation and pardon me if I say with the candor of friendship that I think your time too valuable and your understanding of too high an order to be wasted on these paralogisms. You will perceive I hope also that I do not consider them as revelations of the Supreme Being whom I would not so far blaspheme as to impute to Him a pretension of revelation couched at the same time in terms which He would know were never to be understood by those to whom they were addressed.” LETTER TO GENERAL ALEXANDER SMYTH MONTICELLO January 17 1825.

I do not profess to be possessed of the same intellect or literary skills as either Paine or Jefferson . But, I can frame words plain enough for our times dominated as they are by  persistent myths and popular culture:   “PSSST…PSSST…hey buddy…listen…listen the Easter Bunny told me that Santa Clause “revealed” to him that Santa is Gawd….”

And let me assure everyone~~~ THAT revelation is  just as noble,THAT revelation is just as real, THAT revelation is  just as substantive , THAT revelation is just as inerrant as those purported revelations  of days of yore!

There is NO “reason” IN or  FOR revealed religion.

“But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god.It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.”

Minute Maniac #18

Posted in Religion on June 15, 2011 by RJ Evans

Faith & Freedom? Yeah, Right!

Posted in Politics, Religion with tags , , , , , , on June 10, 2011 by RJ Evans

(Editorial Comment from  host RJ Evans on his American Heathen® radio show – Air Date 06/10/11)

As we mentioned earlier in the show, Ralph Reed’s Faith and Freedom Coalition gathering in Washington, D.C. last weekend launched attacks on anyone who disagrees with their religiously driven political agenda.  Of course, the free exchange of ideas is of utmost importance to a healthy democratic republic.  But, I am disturbed by the title of Reed’s coalition, and the religious motivation for these attacks. Faith and Freedom?  These two words are diametric opposites. There is no freedom in faith, and in faith there can be no freedom.  And herein lay the reason for my editorial tonight.

The idea that faith and freedom are somehow inextricably linked is utter bullshit.  Freedom cannot exist in the presence of faith.  Freedom’s foundation is the intrinsic nature of individual human thought. Faith doesn’t think. In fact, it rejects thinking. But, humans MUST think. Our brains are not part of some collective entity, nor are they simply stamped from some holy alloy of supernatural paper-thin sheet metal.  But, the faithful seem to think that’s the way it is.  Yes indeed, the faithful actually believe that humans are the product of some all-powerful manufacturing mogul. And, in their callowness, they do their absolute best to destroy freedom wherever it may be.  Because faith demands that freedom be invalidated.

So why are faith and freedom polar opposites?  Well, let’s take a quick look at the dictionary’s definitions of the words

Faith – noun
1.confidence or trust in a person or thing.
2.belief that is not based on proof.

Freedom – noun
1.the state of being free or at liberty rather than in confinement or under physical restraint.
2.exemption from external control, interference, regulation, etc.
3.the power to determine action without restraint.

Faith is the total and absolute abandonment of freedom and liberty. Faith requires control, interference, and regulation of the mind and body under the guise of sin.  Faith calls for interference, regulation and external control over the whole of the individual even though there is no evidence of authority for such restrictions.  Faith demands the power to determine the actions of all, and will use restraint to do so. Faith disposes of fact in favor of fiction, thereby creating false dictum to achieve its goal of control. Questioning faith is met with interference. Challenging faith is met with restriction and regulation.  Faith insists on the total abandonment of freedom to authority without question under the threat of violence. Faith requires no evidence, putting blind trust into a supernatural being therefore negating any need for independent freedom of thought or action.

If anyone can find freedom in faith, I dare them to try to defend their position in a cognitive and reasoned way!  Because quite frankly, if they actually do try, they will make asses of themselves in short order and I want to laugh at their idiotic expense!

I find it reprehensible that anyone can use the word faith as a corollary to freedom or vice-versa.  In fact, I find it vile, worthy of every ounce of my disdain.  To even suggest for one iota of a second that faith can lead to, be synonymous with, or in any way be associated with freedom is the most fucking idiotic, ignorant, despicable, dastardly, disgusting, piece of shit I have ever heard.

Freedom does not come at the tip of faith’s sword, or the barrel of faith’s gun, or under threat of hell, fire and brimstone.  It is an inherent characteristic of the human brain.  Unfortunately, there are far too many people who have chosen to allow their gray matter to be mashed under the fascist jackboot of self-imposed stupidity of faith.  They have the freedom to have faith, but there is no freedom in faith.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 157 other followers

%d bloggers like this: