On the Demise of Air America

(The following is a rant by David 2 on his January 23rd broadcast of “Brutally Honest“. It has been posted here with his permission.)

On Thursday, January 21st, Air America Radio announced that they would be closing their doors and shutting off operations.

Tonight, as this show is airing on ShockNet Radio, Air America is running repeats of previous programming.  Their staff has already been let go.  As of 9pm Eastern time on January 25th, Air America will be officially off the air for good.

And with it the last liberal syndication network will disappear.

Conservative and neo-conservative talk show parrots are reveling in this news, of course.  They know that their icons still have a job.  Their dominance on the radio dial is still intact.

What they FAIL to comprehend, though, is that they NEEDED a liberal syndication network like Air America to be on the air even more than the liberals needed it.

You see, the key to the success of conservative and neo-conservative talk radio has been the abolition of the FCC’s anti-American policy fraudulently known as the “Fairness Doctrine”.  It was a policy that neutralized political discussions on radio and television as long as there was no “equal time” provided for opposing viewpoints.  For every Gene Siskel giving a “Thumbs up”, you HAD to have a Roger Ebert to give a “Thumbs down”, or else you weren’t allowed to give either one.

Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingram, and all the others would NOT be allowed to give the kind of shows they provide today if the “Fairness Doctrine” was still in place.  They’d still be doing ZOO Radio, hawking prefabricated Top-40’s bubblegum music, or playing morose country music about losing your home and your dog to a cheatin’ heart.  Or else they would have to actually work WITH and give equal time to their liberal counterparts, watching as their collection of cleverly-worded cheap shots and intellectual twisters are sabotaged on the spot.  They certainly wouldn’t be the shinning superstars that they are now.

And the eternal response to the criticism of talk radio has always been to simply follow their example.  Okay, if you don’t like conservative-dominated radio shows, then do what they did!  Go ahead!  Find a backer, set up your own syndication network, get some affiliates, and do your own radio shows.

Never mind, of course, that the big syndicators gave away the candy store for a few years, offering their headline shows at no cost to the potential affiliates in exchange for getting the audience hooked as well as listening to plugs from their national sponsors.  Never mind that this was done at a time when there really was such a thing as local radio stations and not corporate-owned corporate-cloned puppet stations.  Never mind that trying to get liberals to do anything as a collective group is like trying to herd cats, while conservatives are more prone to the cultish mindset.  NEVER MIND those things!  Just do what the cons and neocons did and liberals should be fine!

And that is what the people behind Air America did in 2004.  They found a backer, they set up shop, they got some affiliates, they brought in talent like Al Frankin and Randi Rhodes, and they launched Air America Radio.

And right from the start, the cons and neo-cons were saying it won’t last.  They don’t have a message.  They don’t know how to do a radio show or how to retain an audience.

Unfortunately they were proven right.  Air America couldn’t survive as it was.  Even when a second liberal radio network, Nova M Radio, was launched, it too lost money and went out of business.

But Limbaugh and others shouldn’t be laughing about this.  They should be worrying.  They should be regretting poking fun at the liberal stations and wishing them ill.  Because with the fall of Air America Radio, liberals now can go back to their fallback position of trying to restore the anti-American policy known as the “Fairness Doctrine”.  And with a Democrat in the White House and the Democrats in control of Congress, they have a chance of pulling it off.  Because if THEY can’t succeed in talk radio, then they want to make sure that NOBODY succeeds in it either!

And I gotta tell you folks, despite my own ongoing criticism of conservative and neoconservative programming, despite me calling them out on their cultish partisan tactics, despite me calling them trained parrots and paid puppets, I understand and appreciate that this has been a highly successful business for them.  They rake in MILLIONS in contract deals and book sales and speaking tours.  I can’t help but be envious of their success.  I would love to get even a fraction of what they make in a year.

But even though I continue to condemn the message as well as castigate the messenger, I certainly would not wish ill upon the MEDIUM itself.  Because the MEDIUM itself is a powerful tool, no matter which political faction uses it.  The key is being able TO use it.

Even though Air America failed, they still were able to get their voices out.  They still managed to raise enough of an audience to help get a comedian like Al Franken elected to the US Senate.  They provided the platform for Rachel Maddow to go on to be a star on MSNBC.  They gave a voice to groups like the Freedom From Religion Foundation.  They reassured like-minded people that they’re not alone, that they’re not crazy when they saw all of the lies and hypocrisy of the cons and neocons, that they don’t have to listen to an endless parade of the same recycled talking points and the same cultish mantras being churned out by the cons and neo-con talent in-between commercials for diamond dealers and gold marketers.

That is why I make this appeal now to any liberal who is hearing this show: don’t give up on the medium.  There IS an alternative to the conservative and neoconservative propaganda machine.  There IS a platform that the conservatives and neoconservatives cannot claim as their exclusive monopoly.  You are listening to that alternative right now.

Let’s get brutally honest here… whether you know it or not, and whether the conservatives and neoconservatives want to accept it, Internet radio IS the next generation of this medium.  And it is a digital OCEAN full of messages and ideas that CANNOT be co-opted by the conservative and neoconservative propaganda machine.

Sure there’s digital satellite radio… Sirius/XM… which is a government-endorsed monopoly already contaminated with conservative and SOME liberal programming.  But that method is and always has been a temporary measure.  A stopgap idea.  A corporate-run way to fill the gap between the Internet and terrestrial radio.  It goes where the Internet could not… in cars and in homes without a computer.

However that gap is closing.  During my visit to the ShockNet Studios last November, I was riding around the streets of Norman and Oklahoma City with ShockNet Radio coming out the car’s speakers.

Yes, you heard me. ShockNet Radio, an Internet-based radio station, was being heard INSIDE A CAR!

And with more and more vehicles being made with Internet access and smartphone access, it was only a matter of time before it would be possible to hear Internet radio stations from your car.

Anyone who has an iPhone or any other smart phone that has web-browsing access to the Internet can now hear ShockNet Radio’s live streaming audio feed anywhere they have coverage.  This is not hypothetical.  This is not the fleeting fantasy of futurists.  This is real.  This is happening right now.

WE ARE THE ALTERNATIVE!  WE ARE the answer to the conservative and neoconservative domination of terrestrial radio.  WE ARE the future.  They are the past.  They are the dinosaurs, and eventually they WILL go the way of the dinosaurs.

My challenge to the former listeners of Air America Radio… my challenge to the former listeners of Nova M Radio… my challenge to any liberal out there who feels like they’re being shut out of the medium is this: forget about the “Fairness Doctrine”.  Let it remain the closet monster for conservative and neo-conservative media personalities.  Don’t turn to the government to resurrect some antiquated dictatorial rule that belongs in the same trashcan of history as the Edsel.  Turn to us.  COME to ShockNet Radio!  Come over to Internet Radio itself!

This is MY definition of a “Fairness Doctrine”: if you don’t like what you hear on Internet Radio, you can always create your own show.  You don’t need an FCC license.  You don’t need to worry about broadcast towers.  You don’t have to worry about speech restrictions.  You don’t even have to worry about ratings or sponsors.  When I got started in Internet Radio back in 1999, I worked with a low-end computer, low-speed computer access, two Walkman players, and ten-year old audio equipment that I bought at Radio Shack.  ANYONE can start their own Internet radio show.  ANYONE.  THAT’S FAIRNESS!  THAT is “equal time”!

If you don’t like what you hear on ShockNet Radio, you can always come up with ideas for your own show and speak with RJ Evans about hosting it.  You don’t have to be live.  This show is proof of it.  You don’t have to be in the studio if you’re not living in the Oklahoma City area.  Again, this show is proof of it.  The beauty of the Internet allows you to broadcast anywhere and to be heard anywhere you have access.  And I mean ANYWHERE on the planet!  THE ONLY limitations are access and your willingness to actually BE the voices that you so desperately want to have heard.  And that access is spreading more and more as technology allows us to be heard from smart phones, from smart cars, and even from smart homes.

But more importantly, if you hear something that you like, then you need to HYPE IT UP to your friends, to your family members, to your neighbors, to people that you know.  That’s the real reason why liberal talk radio fails.  Even if conservative syndicators did cut a few corners to get where they are, that just means you have to work twice as hard to make sure that you can beat them at their own game.

Yes, I do mourn the loss of Air America Radio, like I mourned the loss of Nova M Radio, because they helped to provide the alternative to the conservative and neo-conservative propaganda machine.  But just because the networks couldn’t survive the harsh realities of business doesn’t mean that the medium needs to suffer for it.  The alternative exists!  You just have to step up and embrace it.

4 Responses to “On the Demise of Air America”

  1. Well said, David, and with the recent SCT decision declaring UNconstitutional the Federal law restricting corporate electioneering, the republic of the United States will become more and more like Singapore: heartily embracing consumerism, while stamping out, with Corporate/Government imprimatur, individualism.

  2. Eisenhower presaged the dire coming of the Corporate, military-industrial, takeover of America, at the expense of and to the detriment of INDIVIDUALISM:

    A portion of Ike’s Farewell Address Jan 1960:

    “Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

    American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions.

    This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence – economic, political, even spiritual – is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

    In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

    We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

    Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

    In this revolution, research has become central, it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

    Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

    The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is gravely to be regarded.

    Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite. The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is gravely to be regarded.

    It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system – ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

    Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society’s future, we – you and I, and our government – must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering for, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without asking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.

    Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be, instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.

    Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.

    Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose differences, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment. As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war – as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years – I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight.

    Happily, I can say that war has been avoided. Steady progress toward our ultimate goal has been made. But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizen, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along that road.

    So – in this my last good night to you as your President – I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace. I trust that in that service you find some things worthy; as for the rest of it, I know you will find ways to improve performance in the future.

    You and I – my fellow citizens – need to be strong in our faith that all nations, under God, will reach the goal of peace with justice. May we be ever unswerving in devotion to principle, confident but humble with power, diligent in pursuit of the Nations’ great goals.

    To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America’s prayerful and continuing aspiration:

    We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love….”

  3. What the hell happened anyway? Money? I thought they were doing better than that but I did wonder why they weren’t expanding. I’m in a capital city and we didn’t even have an Air America station here. Of course, we were shunned for NYC. But a business has to grow, not stagnate.

    We’re left with the internet and need to support stations like ShockNet but we need more outreach than that and one does have to wonder how long before they muzzle the internet.

  4. There are still some liberal or progressive radio around. Here in Minneapolis we have a strong progressive station, http://www.am950ktnf.com. We still get Bill Press, Stephanie Miller, Ed Schultz, Thom Hartmann and Mike Milloy. The station is in their 5 or 6th year of operation and is supporting themselves financially. They have local programming from 5-7 weekdays and some self produced or time purchased programming on the weekend.

    Self disclosure, I was part of the Minnesota Atheists program that ran for a year and half on the station.

    So it is possible, it just needs someone to get local radio going. The need there is to change ownership rules to help increase local ownership. Our market has Salem Radio, a national conservative Christian radio company, has 3 frequencies here. It can happen, it just needs someone with the money and ability to get a radio station.

    Scott

Comments are closed.